Knight Foundation

Informed & Engaged Communities

Knight Blog

The blog of the John S. & James L. Knight Foundation

Debuting Truth Teller from the Washington Post; Real-time lie detection service at your service (not quite yet)

Jan. 29, 2013, 9:03 a.m., Posted by Cory Haik – 8 Comments

By Cory HaikThe Washington Post's Executive Producer for Digital News

In August 2011, Michele Bachmann held a small rally in the parking lot of a sports bar in Indianola, Iowa with a few dozen people. Over the course of the event, Bachmann, like many politicians, repeatedly misled her audience. The Post’s National Political Editor, Steven Ginsberg, was at the event and detected a problem: no one attending seemed to realize they were being misled. From that moment, the Post set out to try to fix that problem and to give the public the information it needs at the moment it needs it.

Our solution is Truth Teller, which aims to fact check speeches in as close to real time as possible. Truth Teller is a prototype of a news application built by the Post with funding from Knight Foundation's Prototype Fund. The prototype, built in three months, is a big step toward real-time fact checking.

The Post is dedicated to this project because we believe strongly that informing and educating the public is one of the most critical missions we can perform, particularly when it comes to our elected officials - regardless of their political affiliation. Amid the cacophony of an instant-news culture, identifying the truth is both harder and more important than ever. Facts themselves are increasingly under attack and falsehoods can easily and instantly find their way to a mass audience. In fact, many are designed to.

For the prototype, we focused on the coming debate over tax reform, both because of its timing and importance. The tax debate will play out over several months and naturally lends itself to deceit and deception - even moreso than many policy discussions. We hope that our application will help direct the conversation toward the truth as it is happening so that Americans get a fair shot at deciding this critical issue.

The Truth Teller prototype was built and runs with a combination of several technologies - some new, some very familiar. We've combined video and audio extraction with a speech-to-text technology to search a database of facts and fact checks. The Post also worked with Dan Schultz, creator of Truth Goggles, as he helped consult and shared his knowledge of real-time fact checking. We are effectively taking in video, converting the audio to text, matching that text to our database, and then displaying, in real time, what’s true and what’s false. The key to the project’s success is building an authoritative database - our goal is to identify falsehoods, not create more of them.

<technical_details>

We are transcribing videos using Microsoft Audio Video indexing service (MAVIS) technology. MAVIS is a Windows Azure application which uses Deep Neural Net (DNN) based speech recognition technology to convert audio signals into words. Using this service, we are extracting audio from videos and saving the information in our Lucene search index as a transcript. We are then looking for the facts in the transcription. Finding distinct phrases to match is difficult. Instead, we are focusing on patterns.

We are using approximate string matching, or a fuzzy string searching algorithm. We are implemented a modified version Rabin-Karp using Levenshtein distance algorithm. This will be modified to recognize paraphrasing and negative connotations in the future.

</technical_details>

What you see in the prototype is actual live fact checking - each time the video is played the fact checking starts anew. It needs more technical work and we need more facts, but it works and we’ll keep working on it. Can this be applied to streaming video in the future? Yes. Can this work if someone is holding up a phone to record a politician in the middle of a parking lot in Iowa? Yes, we believe it can.

The Washington Post Truth Teller team

Cory Haik, Executive Producer for Digital News, Steven Ginsberg, National Political Editor Joey Marburger, Mobile Product Director Yuri Victor, UX Director Siva Ghatti, Director, Application Development Ravi Bhaskar, Principal Software Engineer Gaurang Sathaye, Principal software engineer Julia Beizer, Mobile Projects Editor Sara Carothers, Producer

Related: "Realtime Political Fact-Checking Becomes A Reality With WaPo's 'Truth Teller'" in Tech Crunch

Comments

Jan. 31, 2013, 6:13 p.m.

LeaningRight.com

California Penal Code, Sec. 637.3(a): "No person or entity in this state shall use any system which examines or records in any manner voice prints or other voice stress patterns of another person to determine the truth or falsity of statements made by such other person without his or her express written consent given in advance of the examination or recordation." Just saying.

Feb. 1, 2013, 11:07 a.m.

Tlyna

So leaningright, you would rather just hear lies? Unbelievable!

Feb. 1, 2013, 12:03 p.m.

agayler

I would like to see a subscription service via cable TV which would provide a "True/False" crawl along the bottom of your TV screen.
The only thing I don't like is that whoever designed the page put "false" above the statement, and the statement is not in quotation marks. This creates the impression that the false statement is the true explanation. I'd rather see it with the falsehood in quotation marks above the word "false".

Feb. 1, 2013, 1:18 p.m.

Kristine

California Penal Code, Sec. 637.3(a), as quoted in LeaningRight's comment, pertains only to using a speaker's voice itself ~ "voice prints or other voice stress patterns" ~ to determine truth or falseness. The Post's system relies on the facts uttered, not on the voice that utters them. Just saying.

Feb. 2, 2013, 8:14 a.m.

Ron Baker

Like everything in life the Truth Teller has potential to be used for good and bad. But, after more than 40 years working with media, grassroots organizations, local and regional governments, nonprofits and corporations, I am truly excited for the “good” potential use. Hopefully, it will be used to help all of us, i.e. the voting public and everyday consumers, wade through the misleading statements and purposely misdirecting and false use of information our culture, until now, not only engendered but also tolerates as the norm. Even better, at some future time, I personally hope to use it when I purchasing a food or beverage item, for example, to help me cut through the garbage claims of the packaging and immediately see if the item is good for me to consume.

Feb. 6, 2013, 12:06 a.m.

malclave

What are the chances this will be used to actually judge facts instead of how well the ideology matches the WaPo?

Feb. 10, 2013, 12:38 p.m.

matdisn

This appears to not be a lie-detector (as some either hope for or fear it is), rather it is a 'reality checker' finding out if this current phrase matches with what the person previously said or if the stated facts are actually exactly as previously presented as FACTS. This does seem to be a good idea and is something which I teach about. I remind my readers and listener to Never merely accept a news report just because it appears on the news or in print! Always ask, "from whom as the source?" AND, "for whose benefit?". The answers to those two questions truly shape each report and are extremely useful for rating a report on the MOORE ACTUALITY SCALE. I know for a fact that 'media' will alter a crime scene merely to make a better picture (for the purpose of whomever is forwarding the picture). And I know that the goal of reporters is to win an award or The Prize and no matter how many lives they endanger or cost in that process. [and on a similar topic, "The right of the general public to know"; IT DOES NOT EXIST!! These are the reasons I had G R pulled away from his boastful reporting of being right up in the action; and he was betraying our military! He ought to have been brought up on treason charges. sorry, I digressed. As is true of any invention or new technology , it has potential for good or bad (and that is up to individualized interpretation and the history writers) the same as is true with any new invention or ability. KEEP AN EYE ON THIS AND HOW IT IS TO BE USED. As a mere fact checker, used as a super 'Googgling' process, then it seems like a good way to immediately cross-reference and reality-check with known events and prior quotes. It is a oral/verbal way to do an extremely fast Google search. Is it (or will it be possible to purchase and either install on an individual computer or to run within news reports (WOW!)? Or will this method be avail OR SUPPLANTED into all media reports or into all newspapers' pages on line? POWERFUL and dangerous!! WHO CAN CONTROL THE SOURCES WHICH ARE USED TO VERIFY AND WHO CONTROLS THE FEEDBACK OF THE 'MATCHING'? Good concept, I hope to use it often AT MY OWN CHOOSING and with always seeking the truth regarding My Two Moore Questions. (it is now time to see if this typing makes it to the screen for others to read)))jm

Feb. 21, 2013, 10:53 p.m.

Rambyan

I like this idea. A lot. Unfortunately, I believe that any good politician (obviously not Michele Bachmann) will always use correct facts that will promote their own (or their financial supporters) agenda. No office-holding worthy politician will assume that the public will blindly follow them because they represent the party that defends their one-issue vote in this age, where facts are as far away as your cell phone.

Add Your Comment